In October, 2003, I suggested that Web content should be written for the Web rather than tied down by the assumptions of paper and pencil. At the time, I believed that the wiki was the most powerful tool available for practical hypertext writing. Then I downloaded Tinderbox 2.1 (now it is 4.0.0), a Personal Content Management System, Tinderbox for MacOS (9 & X). It’s like no content management system I’ve ever used.
Browsing Note Links in Map View
HTML Export Preview
Tinderbox Explorer View
Tinderbox takes time to understand. It’s unlike any piece of software you’ve ever used, and, unless you have time to learn it, Tinderbox might not be the software for you. On the bright side, the process of learning Tinderbox is also unique. Much of the learning process involves freeing the mind from the beaten-down assumptions and flat limitations we get from using word processors. Once you get over the minor hump of understanding the interface, things just start to fall into place. Nearly every time I think, “I wish it could do this”, I find that I can accomplish it using Tinderbox. In those areas where a touch of arcane knowledge is necessary, the manual suffices. Although it explains the software thoroughly (in 207 pages), the manual includes few examples and little tutorial information. Eastgate prefers not to tell you how to organize your documents, and they likely think that explaining too much might stifle users’ creativity. This is unfortunate. It made that initial learning curve just a bit harder. Fortunately, several articulate Tinderbox Webloggers share their discoveries. Sample files are also a huge help; I suggest you take a look at the sample Tinderbox Website mentioned above. Eastgate also has posted several sample files on the Tinderbox download page. Sadly, Tinderbox is best applied for individual use. It’s not designed with all the useful collaboration features of Web-based content management systems. The import/export features could be used to cooperate with multi-user cvshome.org version control system, but Tinderbox isn’t really designed for collaboration. No Windows version exists now.
Overall, I give Tinderbox just under a perfect score. It’s a unique piece of extremely versatile software. I couldn’t ask for more in stability, convenience, or ability. The only noticeable shortcoming is the Spartan documentation. Still, learning Tinderbox has revolutionized the way I think and write. I might become a hardcore free/open source software fanatic, but this is one of the few software packages I believe is well worth the money (it reatails at US$229).
Review